Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G2010-$40 3,290 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	46.1% Average	Memory 76.5 1-Core 60.8 2-Core 88.5 49% 75.3 Pts	4-Core 92.5 8-Core 107 13% 99.7 Pts	64-Core 111 7% 111 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520 16,336 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(0000 0000) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.51% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 0.3 2% 1.2 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.77 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.51% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 20 96 86 13 69 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.6% Poor	Read 154 Write 96 Mixed 99 SusWrite 64.1 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 9.7 4K Write 17.2 4K Mixed 9.8 36% 12.2 MB/s	DQ Read 31.6 DQ Write 32 DQ Mixed 25 21% 29.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 V01D3LF4GB52826813 8GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.4% Average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 12.8 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 12.2 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 87.4 46% 87.4 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,060x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	829x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325