Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120320
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 29 '22 at 13:25
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 180
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 330
43% 323 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
Asus(1043 0427) 1GB
CLim: 820 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.45.40.14
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
9.35% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 15.3
10% 14.2 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 10.5
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.35%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$53
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 70 53 45 41 40 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 347
Write 276
Mixed 277
SusWrite 54.6
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 22
75% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 45.6
DQ Write 53.8
DQ Mixed 54.1
40% 51.2 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 130%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
368GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 85 82 84 83 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 82.2
Write 87.4
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 83.6
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 76%
WD Gold 2TB (2016)-$87
1TB free
Firmware: RR09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 134 121 123 137 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 169
Write 150
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 128
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
341% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 108%
WD My Passport 2627 5TB
3TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 55.1
Write 26
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 19.3
38% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1
56% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 65%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
744GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 55
Write 26.4
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 19.5
38% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.9
56% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68AP-D3 Builds (Compare 1,405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $471
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback