Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus M2N-XE

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	8.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	24% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M2N-XE (all builds)
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20071024
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 26 '22 at 22:07
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	94%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X2 Dual Core BE-2400 67 User benchmarks, average bench 36% AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Memory 44.5 1-Core 18.7 2-Core 50.6 25% 37.9 Pts	4-Core 50.5 8-Core 51.3 7% 50.9 Pts	64-Core 49.6 3% 49.6 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250E 10,952 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B E213) 1GB CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	8.64% Terrible	Lighting 10.2 Reflection 16.9 Parallax 15.8 8% 14.3 fps	MRender 12.5 Gravity 11.3 Splatting 10.6 9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.64% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ct250mx5 0 250GB 930 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 62 78 77 88 101 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24% Poor	Read 49.2 Write 78.1 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 80.4 16% 70.3 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 19.4 4K Mixed 16.1 47% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 34.3 DQ Write 61.8 DQ Mixed 42.6 34% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 117%
Maxtor 6G160P0 160GB 143 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 101GB free Firmware: KA201V00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 56 59 58 62 62 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	31.1% Below average	Read 48.2 Write 65.3 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 59.5 39% 53.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.5 124% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 36%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$105 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 483GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 48 48 49 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Read 60.7 Write 60.7 Mixed 48.7 SusWrite 48.1 40% 54.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	16.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 5.5 16% 5.57 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.4 GB/s	Latency 182 22% 182 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M2N-XE Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

Motherboard: Asus M2N-XE

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+AMDBench 36%, 5,372 samples	3x
Phenom 9550AMDBench 43%, 2,773 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 8490AMDBench 2%, 4,568 samples	3x
GeForce 7300 LENvidiaBench 0%, 202 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	3x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Asus M2N-XE

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus M2N-XE

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)