Today's hottest deals

MSI 760GM -E51 (MS-7596)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7596
MotherboardMSI 760GM -E51 (MS-7596)  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110228
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateOct 25 '22 at 09:30
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 78%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 945
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 28.3
2-Core 63.4
37% 53.9 Pts
4-Core 77.6
8-Core 130
13% 104 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 58%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$98
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 64 55 54 58 55 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.8% Poor
Read 130
Write 106
Mixed 121
SusWrite 57.6
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 21.8
4K Mixed 13.4
46% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 57
DQ Mixed 36.2
29% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 137%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
409GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 65 55 54 58 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 75.1
Write 65.2
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 57.7
48% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 59%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$34
437GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 80 77 78 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 52.9
Write 62.9
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 80.9
41% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.6
291% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
23% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.7
8% 2.9 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM -E51 (MS-7596) Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 760GM -E51 (MS-7596)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $226
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback