Today's hottest deals

Asus M2N68-AM SE2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M2N68-AM SE2  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20100608
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateOct 23 '22 at 22:51
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 620
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Memory 48.8
1-Core 34.7
2-Core 65.2
32% 49.6 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 105
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 99.4
6% 99.4 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 250
MSI(1462 3012) 2GB
Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.44% Terrible
Lighting 12
Reflection 14
Parallax 17.6
10% 14.5 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 10.5
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.44%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
258GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 80 78 92 99 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 102
Write 107
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 84.2
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 62%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
354GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 69 67 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 71.7
Write 79.2
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 66.8
52% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
21.4% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N68-AM SE2 Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N68-AM SE2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback