Apple MacPro5,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemApple MacPro5,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F221BEC8
Memory90.3 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '22 at 19:50
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU-A (00), 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 180
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 701
62% 524 Pts
64-Core 1,283
79% 1,283 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.8% Below average
Lighting 48.8
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 67.9
40% 49 fps
MRender 31.6
Gravity 49.6
Splatting 24.9
28% 35.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 39%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ortial SSD 256GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1124A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 138 39 75 42 44 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.2% Below average
Read 221
Write 192
Mixed 200
SusWrite 86.1
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 15.4
73% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 28.4
DQ Write 75.1
DQ Mixed 19.1
24% 40.9 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 164%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x16GB
6 of 8 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.9% Above average
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 24.3
62% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 6.5
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro5,1 Builds (Compare 921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Apple MacPro5,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 128% - Outstanding Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback