Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion g4 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion g4 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 166E
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130124
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateOct 19 '22 at 23:03
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 60.1
1-Core 50.7
2-Core 77.4
40% 62.7 Pts
4-Core 95.2
8-Core 87.8
12% 91.5 Pts
64-Core 87.6
5% 87.6 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
HP(103C 166C) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 128GB 128GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 26 32 31 33 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 383
Write 323
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 65.5
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 6.8
40% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 67.3
DQ Write 44.5
DQ Mixed 1.2
16% 37.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 106%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
275GB free
Firmware: GR2OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 76 81 80 80 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 79.5
Write 76.2
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 79
47% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD73I1C1674EV Atermiter5.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.7
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion g4 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 659 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion g4 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $82
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback