ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell PowerEdge R750

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Dell PowerEdge R750
Motherboard	Dell PowerEdge R750 (all builds)
Memory	226 GB free of 256 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1704 x 939 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211217
Uptime	6.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '22 at 15:57
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6334 12 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Memory 72.1 1-Core 116 2-Core 197 72% 128 Pts	4-Core 436 8-Core 801 74% 619 Pts	64-Core 2,332 144% 2,332 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 86%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dell PERC H755 Front 1.5TB 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.16 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 2,938 Write 2,695 Mixed 2,990 642% 2,875 MB/s	4K Read 58.3 4K Write 82.8 4K Mixed 55.9 204% 65.7 MB/s	DQ Read 570 DQ Write 815 DQ Mixed 639 498% 675 MB/s

Zadara VPSA Multi-Path Disk Device 5.5TB 2TB free Firmware: 340 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 146 145 148 154 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.2% Poor	Read 239 Write 452 Mixed 283 SusWrite 146 64% 280 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 11.5 4K Mixed 4.4 17% 6.43 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 86.9 DQ Mixed 86.1 75% 113 MB/s

Zadara VPSA Multi-Path Disk Device 1TB 525GB free Firmware: 340 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 144 145 144 146 152 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.7% Poor	Read 204 Write 447 Mixed 266 SusWrite 145 60% 266 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 8.7 4K Mixed 4.3 14% 5.2 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 84.4 DQ Mixed 102 81% 114 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M393A2K43DB3-CWE 16x16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 237% 16 of 32 slots used 256GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	225% Outstanding	MC Read 83.3 MC Write 109 MC Mixed 93.4 272% 95.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 10.8 48% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 96.7 41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 225% ↑ This bench: 225% Great: 245%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback