Asus P8Z77-V PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

19 months ago, 19 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V PRO (all builds)
Memory	14.5 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130813
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '22 at 11:35
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3550-$335 23,599 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 90.7 2-Core 182 68% 118 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 321 43% 319 Pts	64-Core 318 20% 318 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Asus(1043 8465) 2GB CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.4% Below average	Lighting 37.3 Reflection 38 Parallax 49.1 30% 41.5 fps	MRender 53.2 Gravity 44.5 Splatting 38.4 36% 45.4 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB 17,638 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 51 26 21 29 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 100 Write 81.7 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 36.9 50% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 76%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 6GB free Firmware: JPFOA3GH Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 106 Write 111 Mixed 56.8 68% 91.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 50%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 109 Write 108 Mixed 60.5 68% 92.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 62%
WD WD15EADS-11P8B2 500GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 4GB free Firmware: KC45 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 101 Write 101 Mixed 57.7 64% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 129% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 55%
1 320GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1GB free Firmware: 0104 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	22.7% Poor	Read 63.5 Write 17 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 15.2 23% 30.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 54%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150 16,916 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 13GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 73 Write 83.5 Mixed 47.7 50% 68.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 55%
0 500GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 4GB free Firmware: 0104 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Read 53.7 Write 28.8 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 15.2 22% 30 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 66%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 1TB 4,375 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1GB free Firmware: 0108 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 70 Write 87.7 Mixed 82.7 60% 80.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.6 174% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B1G73EB0-YK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CH9 28GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.6% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 15 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 15.3 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V PRO Builds (Compare 2,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO - $400

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	827x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	556x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	316x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	140x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	138x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	125x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	72x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	69x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	62x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	59x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $855

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16