Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite L855D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite L855D  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121107
Uptime12.5 Days
Run DateSep 29 '22 at 00:10
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4500M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Memory 36
1-Core 29.1
2-Core 43.3
24% 36.1 Pts
4-Core 67.4
8-Core 76.3
9% 71.9 Pts
64-Core 72.1
4% 72.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Toshiba(1179 FB28) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
3.02% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 3.2
3% 4.33 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 5.3
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.02%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
890GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0609B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 176 233 209 202 230 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.4% Average
Read 282
Write 247
Mixed 234
SusWrite 208
55% 243 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 14
39% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 44.7
58% 103 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 101%
SDXC Card 128GB
29GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 4 13 4.9 7.5 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 52.3
Write 15.5
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 8.6
25% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD3-1600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
22.4% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 9.1
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 5.8
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 222
18% 222 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L855D Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L855D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback