Lenovo 82UG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82UG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory33 GB free of 40 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '22 at 01:09
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 36.9
1-Core 172
2-Core 340
90% 183 Pts
4-Core 658
8-Core 1,084
106% 871 Pts
64-Core 1305
81% 1305 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3B28) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.40.60.02
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.3% Below average
Lighting 39.1
Reflection 128
Parallax 74.3
32% 80.4 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 35
27% 32.7 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ9X115N 1TB
816GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51010A12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1599 1818 1861 2370 2408 2206 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 1,139
Write 2,112
Mixed 1,326
SusWrite 2,044
377% 1,655 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 66
225% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 878
DQ Write 447
DQ Mixed 1,058
681% 795 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 270%
Great: 549%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT32G48C40S5.M16A1 Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 39GB
4800, 4800 MHz
32767, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.1% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 10.6
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 2.7
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 217
18% 217 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82UG Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 82UG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback