Today's hottest deals

Positivo C14CR21TV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPositivo C14CR21TV  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo C14CR21TV
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 17 '22 at 15:52
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B800
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Memory 42.7
1-Core 20
2-Core 29.5
22% 30.7 Pts
4-Core 41.5
8-Core 55.6
6% 48.5 Pts
64-Core 49
3% 49 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Device(1297 2027) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.69% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.63 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 2.2
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.69%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 104 181 166 237 216 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.3% Below average
Read 182
Write 105
Mixed 133
SusWrite 181
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 10.7
40% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 37.8
DQ Write 36.6
DQ Mixed 29
24% 34.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 6.9
14% 4.83 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 190
21% 190 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C14CR21TV Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo C14CR21TV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback