Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 93.6 2-Core 197 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 553 58% 465 Pts	64-Core 693 43% 693 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Lighting 21.2 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 19.3 17% 19.3 fps	MRender 23.5 Gravity 20.1 Splatting 15.9 16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 17%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 308GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 212 204 200 200 206 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Read 467 Write 307 Mixed 255 SusWrite 211 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 35.5 100% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 228 201% 302 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Toshiba-0098 9965516-477.A00LF 4x16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	97.9% Outstanding	MC Read 40.8 MC Write 39.2 MC Mixed 35.8 110% 38.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 13.2 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	74x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16