Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	110GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 110GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

22 months ago, 22 months ago.

Motherboard	Microsoft Virtual Machine
Memory	105.2 GB free of 110 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220509
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '22 at 12:50
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD EPYC 74F3 24-Core 35 User benchmarks, average bench 78% None, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Memory 73.4 1-Core 143 2-Core 278 88% 165 Pts	4-Core 482 8-Core 776 77% 629 Pts	64-Core 978 60% 978 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB 496 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 161 169 169 169 167 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Read 494 Write 171 Mixed 223 SusWrite 167 58% 264 MB/s	4K Read 83 4K Write 13.7 4K Mixed 22.7 162% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 13.5 DQ Mixed 26.5 35% 68 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 77%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 387GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 344GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 330 322 320 322 319 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Read 451 Write 458 Mixed 486 SusWrite 323 97% 429 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 55.5 4K Mixed 37.1 122% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 154 116% 156 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 64GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 133% 0, 0, 0 MHz 1024, 32767, 32767 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	187% Outstanding	MC Read 82.4 MC Write 69.4 MC Mixed 71 212% 74.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 56.5 SC Mixed 30.8 98% 34.4 GB/s	Latency 93.7 43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 187% Great: 218%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,147x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,061x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	830x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	433x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325