Monster TULPAR T5

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

20 months ago, 14 months ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T5 (all builds)
Motherboard	Monster TULPAR T5
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20141201
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 27 '22 at 21:02
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$50 15,557 User benchmarks, average bench 60% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 96 2-Core 178 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 479 52% 411 Pts	64-Core 462 29% 462 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M 21,995 User benchmarks, average bench 31% MSI(1462 112D) 3GB CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.3% Below average	Lighting 38.3 Reflection 43.9 Parallax 38.8 31% 40.3 fps	MRender 40.7 Gravity 40.8 Splatting 35.3 32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 480GB 16,522 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 351GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 110 5 109 10 103 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Read 447 Write 200 Mixed 328 SusWrite 101 60% 269 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 87.1 4K Mixed 41.9 157% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 217 184% 268 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 98%
Mushkin MKNSSDAT120GB-DX 120GB 222 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 66GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 130 129 127 127 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Read 380 Write 152 Mixed 192 SusWrite 126 47% 212 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 89.9 4K Mixed 35.7 138% 51.7 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 123 102% 147 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GKH800SO51208-1600 2x8GB 664 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 16.6 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 18.8 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T5 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T5

CPU
Core i7-4710MQIntel $50Bench 60%, 15,557 samples	19x
Core i7-4910MQIntel $110Bench 67%, 6,703 samples	7x
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	14x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	8x
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	6x

SSD
850 EVO mSATA 250GBSamsungBench 95%, 4,026 samples	8x
PLUS 480GBSSDBench 87%, 5,109 samples	3x
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	2x

RAM
2x8GBGKH800SO51208-1600Bench 54%, 664 samples	9x
HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GBKingstonBench 67%, 701 samples	7x
OEM MONSTER 1x8GBMicronBench 30%, 70 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $50

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16