Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '22 at 20:46
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$106
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 74.5
1-Core 134
2-Core 295
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 852
82% 673 Pts
64-Core 1040
64% 1040 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
Asus(1043 8818) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.1% Excellent
Lighting 96.7
Reflection 130
Parallax 94.9
79% 107 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 99.7
Splatting 83.2
83% 104 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$62
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32B2T6TA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 501 344 307 324 279 347 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 2,347
Write 1271
Mixed 925
SusWrite 350
269% 1,224 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 58.8
189% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 586
436% 600 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 201%
Great: 311%
V-gen01sm21ar256sdk 256GB 256GB
222GB free
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 406 413 410 411 418 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 366
Mixed 392
SusWrite 410
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 30.6
140% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 51.7
92% 178 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
854GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 171 174 170 171 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 147
Mixed 97.5
SusWrite 171
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 177 179 180 180 180 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 10.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 9.6
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 33%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 7,163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $524
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback