Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1672 x 816 - 32 Bit colores, 1599 x 828 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateAug 26 '22 at 17:02
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Memory 34.6
1-Core 32.8
2-Core 76.9
28% 48.1 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 169
17% 137 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Citrix Virtual Disk 64GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PVS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 4.2 9.3 57 7.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 358
Write 308
Mixed 410
SusWrite 18.9
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 12.5
46% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 75.7
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 135
94% 114 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 50%
Vmware Virtual disk 21GB
12GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 9.2 9.5 8.9 14 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 79.3
Write 33.1
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 15
34% 46 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
26.8% Poor
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 3.2
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 229
18% 229 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 3 2 0 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback