Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220225
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 20 '22 at 21:48
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 216
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 658
63% 522 Pts
64-Core 857
53% 857 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 135
Parallax 132
120% 138 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 106
Splatting 102
94% 118 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 109%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU635 480GB-$35
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c89
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 40 28 25 28 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 299
Write 58.6
Mixed 51.4
SusWrite 24.2
23% 108 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 13.5
4K Mixed 16.3
57% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 39.7
DQ Mixed 18.7
36% 77.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$17
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 202 211 210 197 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 132
Write 155
Mixed 76
SusWrite 200
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
80% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 31.1
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 23.9
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $937
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback