Today's hottest deals

Samsung R480/R431/R481

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSamsung R480/R431/R481  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R480/R431/R481
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 14:49
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Memory 33.3
1-Core 52.6
2-Core 88.5
33% 58.1 Pts
4-Core 99
8-Core 113
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 92.6
6% 92.6 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310M
Sanyo(144D C551) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.25% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.97 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.25%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 43 46 46 44 43 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.8% Poor
Read 126
Write 58.7
Mixed 103
SusWrite 54.6
19% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 27.1
4K Mixed 17
56% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 68
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 98
71% 90.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CF8 80CE M471B5673FH0-CF8 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 7.4
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.9
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 236
17% 236 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R480/R431/R481 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R480/R431/R481

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback