Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 70% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	84.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

21 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X470-PRO (all builds)
Memory	27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180907
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '22 at 16:07
Run Duration	375 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Memory 73.5 1-Core 124 2-Core 248 81% 149 Pts	4-Core 471 8-Core 768 76% 620 Pts	64-Core 1,203 74% 1,203 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300 112,731 User benchmarks, average bench 83% MSI(1462 C813) Ram: 6GB, Driver: 22.1.2 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	84.5% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 122 Parallax 158 88% 130 fps	MRender 99.1 Gravity 112 Splatting 78 77% 96.3 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68 97,624 User benchmarks, average bench 204% 334GB free (System drive) Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 720 238 241 178 241 242 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	140% Outstanding	Read 1,431 Write 1,570 Mixed 1,227 SusWrite 310 254% 1,134 MB/s	4K Read 38.3 4K Write 50.9 4K Mixed 42.5 140% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 679 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 369 294% 424 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 140% Great: 237%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 105GB free Firmware: R0105A SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 104 24 56 54 25 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 476 Write 430 Mixed 414 SusWrite 116 80% 359 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 50.3 4K Mixed 25.3 100% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 1.2 56% 132 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 100%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 984GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 122 128 127 124 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 108 Write 136 Mixed 53.3 SusWrite 127 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 108%
VendorCo ProductCode 8GB 4,860 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	7.73% Terrible	Read 21.6 Write 13.5 Mixed 8.9 SusWrite 14.9 18% 14.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.73% Great: 8%
External USB3.0 DISK04 500GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 392GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 22 27 27 24 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 69.9 Write 27.1 Mixed 30.6 SusWrite 25.9 45% 38.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 32% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 49%
External USB3.0 DISK02 2TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 155 Write 145 Mixed 77.4 SusWrite 0.2 115% 94.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 67%
External USB3.0 DISK01 2TB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 138 139 138 139 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Read 172 Write 206 Mixed 120 SusWrite 136 214% 158 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1.1 122% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 76%
External USB3.0 DISK00 1TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 22 27 27 24 27 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 193 Write 144 Mixed 89.9 SusWrite 25.3 136% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 74%
External USB3.0 DISK03 1TB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 901GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 139 140 138 139 133 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	58% Above average	Read 141 Write 141 Mixed 110 SusWrite 136 179% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 123% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB 92,358 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.2% Very good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 25 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 22 SC Write 25.8 SC Mixed 24.1 68% 24 GB/s	Latency 93.4 43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,578 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,953x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $189Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	437x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	405x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	287x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	287x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	249x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	286x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	228x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	214x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	279x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	231x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	224x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $637

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)