TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PR
Memory17.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210827
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 13:45
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 63.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 266
84% 158 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 708
74% 592 Pts
64-Core 715
44% 715 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 76.3%
 Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 160C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1631
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.29% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 71.5
Parallax 12.4
9% 31.7 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 16
Splatting 9.3
10% 12 fps
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 9.29%
 Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 891 866 773 748 766 847 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2,320
Write 2379
Mixed 1,635
SusWrite 815
400% 1,787 MB/s
4K Read 69.4
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 94.1
320% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,208
DQ Write 972
DQ Mixed 1065
804% 1,082 MB/s
Poor: 137% ↑
This bench: 290%
 Great: 313%
Nvme JAMESDONKEY JD1024 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: JD2020 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1472 1471 1477 1473 1479 1478 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
241% Outstanding
Read 1,416
Write 1,371
Mixed 804
SusWrite 1,475
285% 1,266 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 15.9
189% 83.2 MB/s
DQ Read 893
DQ Write 1,005
DQ Mixed 481
492% 793 MB/s
Poor: 182% ↑
This bench: 241%
 Great: 241%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 0x0B2C HKED4162DAA1G4MB1 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 13.9
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 13.3
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR Builds (Compare 2,692 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR

CPU
Core i7-11370HIntelBench 74%, 12,227 samples2,670x
Core i5-11300HIntelBench 71%, 8,880 samples22x
GPU
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples1,355x
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples1,334x
RTX 3080Nvidia  $435Bench 187%, 424,051 samples1x
SSD
HFM001TD3JX013N 1TBNvmeBench 229%, 5,082 samples639x
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples538x
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBNvmeBench 225%, 10,852 samples354x
RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2B1 Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GBMicronBench 58%, 1,942 samples597x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples549x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GBMicronBench 67%, 5,644 samples361x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback