Today's hottest deals

Asus N550JV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus N550JV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N550JV
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131119
Uptime110.2 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 00:38
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 157
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 428
47% 370 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 11CD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.9% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 4.9
3% 5.63 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.6
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.9%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 418 336 301 305 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 451
Mixed 366
SusWrite 352
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 46
162% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 96.8
DQ Mixed 140
112% 161 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair SODIM DDR3 1600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 19.9
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N550JV Builds (Compare 615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N550JV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $450
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback