BULL BullSequana Edge

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemBULL BullSequana Edge  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory246.5 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '22 at 18:18
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon D-2187NT
CPU0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.6% Very good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 90
2-Core 180
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 643
58% 491 Pts
64-Core 1,618
100% 1,618 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_5200_MTFDDAK960TDC 960GB
707GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D1MH027
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 257 271 231 287 348 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 431
Write 444
Mixed 322
SusWrite 286
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 28.1
113% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 307
228% 300 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 106%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 129 135 124 140 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 166
Mixed 95.7
SusWrite 138
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
246% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A8G40MB2-CVF 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
120% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 61.5
MC Mixed 43.5
141% 49.3 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 9.6
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 120%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback