Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151208
Uptime	6.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '17 at 14:21
Run Duration	253 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 94.7 2-Core 189 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 479 52% 409 Pts	64-Core 482 30% 482 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.9 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74 29,295 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 461 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 546 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 38 (A3) Unknown 100 100 200 (94) Unknown 100 100 80578 (95) Unknown 100 100 1182 (96) Unknown 100 100 1004 (97) Unknown 100 100 1167 (A4) Unknown 100 100 24000 (A5) Unknown 100 100 66 (A6) Unknown 100 100 3 (A7) Unknown 100 100 18 (A9) Unknown 100 100 99 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 53 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 35313776918552 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 103711 (F2) Unknown 100 100 134286 (F5) Unknown 100 100 141750 (F6) Unknown 100 100 161156 (F7) Unknown 100 100 0	37.9% Below average	Read 237 Write 141 Mixed 139 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 11.1 64% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 24.2 DQ Write 30.2 DQ Mixed 10.7 13% 21.7 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 92%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2.5TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7210 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 43 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 454 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 23 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 44 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 184685035556 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 99 99 454 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 565 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	102% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 177 Mixed 158 128% 171 MB/s	4K Read 4.45 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.33 262% 2.31 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%
HP MB2000FBZPN 2TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 872GB free Firmware: HPD1 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 127 Write 136 Mixed 126 98% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 2.24 4K Mixed 0.35 102% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 76%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 186GB free Firmware: 0A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 104 (03) Spinup time 137 137 30090264964 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 328 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1936 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 164 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 391 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 391 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 219044184100 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	87.4% Excellent	Read 117 Write 187 Mixed 130 108% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.46 148% 1.61 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 113%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 725GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 31.1 Write 26.1 Mixed 24 34% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.22 61% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 44%
Seagate Expansion Desk 1TB 564 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 75GB free, PID 3320 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 30 Write 26.9 Mixed 10.7 27% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 0.68 4K Mixed 0.16 30% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT8GC72B4NG0N 4x8GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	56.5% Above average	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 19 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 11.9 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M720 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	71x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	7x
Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples	7x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	15x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	11x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
HG5d Q Series 256GBToshiba $225Bench 82%, 3,223 samples	4x
840 250GBSamsungBench 77%, 2,100 samples	4x

RAM
M393B5170EH1- 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 40 samples	9x
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	6x
HMT351U7CFR8A 4x4GBHynixBench 89%, 39 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16