Today's hottest deals

MSI A75A-G35 (MS-7695)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7695
MotherboardMSI A75A-G35 (MS-7695)  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121107
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 19 '22 at 13:05
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3650 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 40.7
2-Core 81.9
43% 65.5 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 162
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D
MSI(1462 7695) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
1.92% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.63 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 3.2
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.92%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 71 59 60 61 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 126
Write 141
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 61.8
73% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.8% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A75A-G35 (MS-7695) Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A75A-G35 (MS-7695)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Poor Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback