Today's hottest deals

Acer Veriton X2611G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Veriton X2611G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton X2611G
Memory5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colores, ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '22 at 08:56
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G645-$42
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 90.2
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 151
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 148
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 0492) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.45% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.77 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.4
1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.45%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 93 104 54 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 56.3
Write 59.3
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 82.3
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Nanya NT2GC64B88G0NF-CG 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.5% Below average
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 10.2
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton X2611G Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton X2611G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback