Today's hottest deals

HP Presario CQ58 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Presario CQ58 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1885
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '22 at 20:25
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-300 APU-$120
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Memory 21
1-Core 5.1
2-Core 7.9
9% 11.3 Pts
4-Core 10.7
8-Core 13.1
2% 11.9 Pts
64-Core 14.9
1% 14.9 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OAH20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 54 75 48 21 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 77.4
Write 52.4
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 39.8
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 58%
Mass Storage Device 32GB
11GB free, PID 2536
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 8.4 15 12 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
5.97% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 7.7
Mixed 8.9
SusWrite 9.6
13% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
28% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.97%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.22% Terrible
MC Read 2.3
MC Write 1.5
MC Mixed 2.3
6% 2.03 GB/s
SC Read 1.1
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 1.9
4% 1.43 GB/s
Latency 313
13% 313 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 6.22%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Presario CQ58 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Presario CQ58 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback