Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140715
Uptime14.4 Days
Run DateJul 08 '22 at 15:00
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$110
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 174
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 500
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 3658) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 17.3
15% 17.7 fps
MRender 22.7
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 15.9
15% 19.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC210 2.5 7MM 256GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20001L00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 300 257 265 303 257 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 470
Write 300
Mixed 296
SusWrite 269
74% 334 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 25.2
95% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 222
193% 286 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 84%
Hitachi HUS722T2TALA600 2TB
905GB free
Firmware: RADEMU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 136 137 137 136 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 87.7
Write 165
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 136
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
280% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 94
43% 94 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,834 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback