Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP ZBook Studio G7 Mobile Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8736
Memory	16 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210503
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '22 at 14:33
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10850H 6,246 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	60% Above average	Memory 72.5 1-Core 76.8 2-Core 145 58% 98 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 492 44% 374 Pts	64-Core 638 40% 638 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 93%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia Quadro T2000 with Max-Q Design 1,016 User benchmarks, average bench 39% HP(103C 8736) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.25 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37% Below average	Lighting 44.6 Reflection 52.7 Parallax 44.4 36% 47.2 fps	MRender 48.5 Gravity 43.1 Splatting 47.9 38% 46.5 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 43%
Intel UHD Graphics 187,969 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 8736) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	3.24% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 53.7 Parallax 3.6 3% 20.3 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 3.2 Splatting 5 4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.24% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB2T0HALB-000H1 2TB 251 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS0NEXG SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 332 340 358 348 193 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 1,094 Write 312 Mixed 517 SusWrite 274 121% 549 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 40.6 4K Mixed 34.8 114% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 264 189% 251 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 361%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron MT40A2G16SKL-062E:B 2x16GB 256 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.8% Good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 22.3 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 22.4 SC Mixed 16.6 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 95.7 42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 95%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	180x
Quadro T1000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 36%, 566 samples	57x
Quadro T2000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 39%, 1,016 samples	53x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H7 512GBSamsungBench 235%, 692 samples	62x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg6aznv512gBench 191%, 406 samples	58x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	40x

RAM
K4ABG165WA-MCWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 84%, 462 samples	112x
H5ANBG6NAMR-XNC 2x16GBHynixBench 87%, 368 samples	70x
MT40A2G16SKL-062E:B 2x16GBMicronBench 84%, 256 samples	51x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16