PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T1600 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T1600 (all builds) |
Memory | 19.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111102 |
Uptime | 20.2 Days |
Run Date | Jun 13 '22 at 23:22 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 50% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E31225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
58.7%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 38 64 84 4.1 MB/s
|
37%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
42%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E31225IntelBench 69%, 3,353 samples | 203x |
Xeon E3-1245IntelBench 70%, 3,302 samples | 166x |
Xeon E31270IntelBench 71%, 3,539 samples | 98x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 53x |
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples | 49x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 43x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 23% - Poor | Total price: $25 |