Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision T1600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision T1600
MotherboardDell Precision T1600  (all builds)
Memory19.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111102
Uptime20.2 Days
Run DateJun 13 '22 at 23:22
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 50%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 150
57% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 284
38% 283 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 38.3
30% 38.8 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 27.6
28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 38 64 84 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 417
Write 22.2
Mixed 45
SusWrite 42.1
28% 132 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 9.5
46% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 86.5
DQ Mixed 68.2
58% 85.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.1
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 13.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T1600 Builds (Compare 584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback