PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 25.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H61M-HG4 (all builds) |
Memory | 11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130711 |
Uptime | 1.2 Days |
Run Date | Jun 12 '22 at 03:44 |
Run Duration | 178 Seconds |
Run User | THA-User |
Background CPU | 43% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3330
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
36.3%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
44.9%
Average
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 99 40 27 19 18 MB/s
|
25.5%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
11GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 55 54 56 53 51 MB/s
|
28.9%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
44GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston termiter9.A01LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
|
33.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 6 | 4 | 60 | 23.1" | 1280 720 | GSM59A9 23EA53 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 35x |
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 18x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 17x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 24x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 15x |
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 14x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $384 |