Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '22 at 18:22
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7740X-$90
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 178
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 485
50% 405 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 146C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 155
Reflection 207
Parallax 141
127% 168 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 145
Splatting 122
122% 153 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 120%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$110
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 441 466 92 81 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 456
Mixed 420
SusWrite 269
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 55.7
189% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 111%
Great: 128%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$35
463GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 138 151 151 148 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 126
Write 118
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 147
74% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75.5% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 22.2
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 22.3
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $620
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback