Today's hottest deals

Huananzhi Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHuananzhi Default string  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-TF
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '22 at 10:06
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 190
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 756
67% 567 Pts
64-Core 1,491
92% 1,491 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$70
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 747 428 426 420 414 420 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 2,227
Write 2,073
Mixed 1,468
SusWrite 476
348% 1,561 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 70.4
232% 79 MB/s
DQ Read 708
DQ Write 402
DQ Mixed 581
425% 564 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 215%
Great: 302%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$30
35GB free
Firmware: 30RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 115 85 87 86 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 404
Write 399
Mixed 373
SusWrite 98.1
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 22.8
117% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 23.9
79% 171 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 78%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
308GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 114
Write 117
Mixed 110
SusWrite 72.3
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.8
187% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0-YK0 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 55.6
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 38.8
129% 45 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 20.2
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 114%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Default string Builds (Compare 288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Huananzhi Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback