Vultr HFC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemVultr HFC  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime15.5 Days
Run DateJun 01 '22 at 01:58
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core (Skylake, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 53.3
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 99.4
51% 83.8 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 108
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 95%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 69GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 834
Write 1019
Mixed 869
204% 908 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 23.8
76% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 85.3
DQ Write 77.5
DQ Mixed 80.4
61% 81.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 20.3
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 17.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback