Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO
Save results to profile Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics179% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99 F8D
Memory184.8 GB free of 192 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 27 '22 at 18:27
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 193
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 739
66% 558 Pts
64-Core 3,330
206% 3,330 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 76.9%
 Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
179% Outstanding
Lighting 234
Reflection 301
Parallax 381
191% 306 fps
MRender 355
Gravity 264
Splatting 195
213% 271 fps
Poor: 162% ↑
This bench: 179%
 Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 150 240GB-$246
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 453 453 451 452 452 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 400
Write 424
Mixed 342
SusWrite 452
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 28.7
100% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 304
240% 331 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 89.9%
 Great: 110%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
419GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 445 445 442 404 396 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 389
Mixed 350
SusWrite 430
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 41
128% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 289
235% 334 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 125%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 16GB
14GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 2.2 4.3 3.9 2.9 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.85% Terrible
Read 36.8
Write 6.2
Mixed 10
SusWrite 4
14% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
62% 2 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑
This bench: 8.85%
 Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6E1 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6E1 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6D1 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6E1 atermiter atermiter atermiter atermiter 191GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 57.2
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 50.9
143% 50.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 118% ↑
This bench: 125%
 Great: 125%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback