Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '22 at 00:50
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$261
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 92.8
1-Core 152
2-Core 304
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 603
8-Core 1,178
105% 890 Pts
64-Core 2,173
134% 2,173 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 116
Parallax 134
109% 128 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 128
Splatting 106
108% 136 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 246 243 238 236 235 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,436
Write 1,291
Mixed 1,196
SusWrite 240
284% 1,291 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 80.4
286% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 939
DQ Write 900
DQ Mixed 333
411% 724 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 241%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
86GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 320 319 317 319 318 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 492
Mixed 466
SusWrite 341
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 58.2
199% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 374 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 120%
Great: 129%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$53
95GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 375 374 368 368 358 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 490
Mixed 465
SusWrite 386
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 64.9
216% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 128%
Great: 130%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: MKAOAA50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 112 111 113 119 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 121
Write 129
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 115
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 57.9
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 42
134% 46.8 GB/s
SC Read 29.3
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 39.6
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 125%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,785 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $613
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback