Today's hottest deals

Viglen DQ67SW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemViglen DQ67SW  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170601
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 22 '22 at 17:18
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$60
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 71.1
2-Core 133
59% 95.6 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 204
20% 166 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 128B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 7.3
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$35
709GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 135 122 95 34 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 75.9
Write 119
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 101
60% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 107%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
32GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 14 11 11 13 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 24.1
Write 17
Mixed 15
SusWrite 13.2
22% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.1
153% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-438.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 15.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ67SW Builds (Compare 440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Viglen DQ67SW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback