Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 179%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 326%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics214% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive395% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory120.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '22 at 18:29
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 32-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 73.1
1-Core 148
2-Core 293
91% 171 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 1,092
93% 801 Pts
64-Core 5,656
350% 5,656 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,104
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
214% Outstanding
Lighting 318
Reflection 302
Parallax 328
259% 316 fps
MRender 346
Gravity 256
Splatting 192
208% 265 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 214%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 2TB
652GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4739 3020 1590 1399 1390 1487 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
395% Outstanding
Read 2,516
Write 4,507
Mixed 3,149
SusWrite 2,271
706% 3,111 MB/s
4K Read 63.7
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 104
330% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,293
DQ Write 1,068
DQ Mixed 1,121
856% 1,160 MB/s
Poor: 277%
This bench: 395%
Great: 604%
Sandisk Extreme Pro 55AF 4TB
453GB free
Firmware: 1087
SusWrite @10s intervals: 744 752 759 761 762 761 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 90%
Amd-raid Array 1 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 122 115 107 118 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 117
Write 133
Mixed 141
SusWrite 114
95% 126 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.5
683% 5.63 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 132%
Amd-raid Array 2 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 134 129 116 132 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 219
Write 243
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 126
125% 171 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1.1
1,186% 9.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 101%
Great: 123%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
1GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 12 8.5 11 12 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.96% Terrible
Read 25.4
Write 4.5
Mixed 2
SusWrite 10.4
11% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.96%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965754-006.C00G 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
180% Outstanding
MC Read 79
MC Write 47.9
MC Mixed 90.4
207% 72.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 40
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 180%
This bench: 180%
Great: 647%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 319%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,274
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback