Today's hottest deals

Compaq RF786AA-ABU SR2019UK GB680

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCompaq RF786AA-ABU SR2019UK GB680  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek NODUSM3
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '22 at 06:19
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 3500+
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Memory 53
1-Core 27.3
2-Core 28.2
27% 36.2 Pts
4-Core 22.6
8-Core 28.1
3% 25.4 Pts
64-Core 27.6
2% 27.6 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150
HP(103C 2A34) 64MB
Ram: 64MB, Driver: 309.08
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.05% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.1
Parallax 0.1
0% 0.1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.05%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 15 19 13 7.1 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 41.5
Write 42.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 13.6
24% 32.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
34% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.77 GB/s
SC Read 0.7
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 2.6
5% 1.63 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RF786AA-ABU SR2019UK GB680 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Compaq RF786AA-ABU SR2019UK GB680

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback