Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-BD4
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '22 at 12:04
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 186
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 753
65% 555 Pts
64-Core 1,269
78% 1,269 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$155
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.45.40.14
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Lighting 28.7
Reflection 37.7
Parallax 37.2
23% 34.5 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 25.9
21% 26 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 48 88 121 109 96 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.5% Below average
Read 230
Write 228
Mixed 134
SusWrite 101
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 8.7
48% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 25.7
DQ Mixed 30.8
32% 55.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 58%
Netac NVME SSD 256GB
204GB free
Firmware: T1007A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1135 1144 1142 1153 1158 412 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,495
Write 1,178
Mixed 958
SusWrite 1,024
261% 1,164 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 25.1
181% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 704
DQ Write 546
DQ Mixed 565
439% 605 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 202%
Great: 241%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
931GB free
Firmware: A3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 112 111 110 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 99.9
Write 109
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 111
67% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.4% Good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 20.3
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback