Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X2 521 295 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Memory 56.3 1-Core 45.9 2-Core 70 37% 57.4 Pts	4-Core 69.2 8-Core 78.8 10% 74 Pts	64-Core 73.8 5% 73.8 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 530 5,672 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(1B0A 90A1) 1GB CLim: 699 MHz, MLim: 396 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 347.09 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.36% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 5.8 Parallax 1.2 3% 3.67 fps	MRender 5.7 Gravity 4.5 Splatting 3.3 4% 4.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.36% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67 19,126 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 79 97 103 91 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 73.8 Write 109 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 87.5 55% 76.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMR1870EC58E9F1333 Elpida EBJ41UF8BCF0-DJ-F RMR1870EC58E9F1333 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.3% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 11.2 26% 9.03 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.8 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Phenom II X6 1065TAMDBench 55%, 1,141 samples	5x
Phenom II X2 521AMDBench 44%, 295 samples	4x
Athlon II X4 645AMDBench 46%, 5,346 samples	2x

SSD
NE O N400 SSD 240GBKlevvBench 37%, 1 sample	2x
512GSQ 512GBYssdjqb-Bench 52%, 4 samples	2x
0 250GBCt250mx5Bench 89%, 930 samples	1x

RAM
4x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 252 samples	3x
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 16GBUnknownBench 34%, 166 samples	2x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	2x