Asrock FM2A85X Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A85X Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '22 at 01:13
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 133
60% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 216
28% 214 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6970
Sapphire(174B E182) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 25.4
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 27.1
21% 27.7 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 26.3
Splatting 19.5
19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CHN-25SATAC3-120 120GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0411A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 51 45 51 51 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 303
Write 100
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 52.3
29% 134 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 9.5
77% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 22.6
DQ Write 77
DQ Mixed 17.1
22% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Nanya M2X4G64CB88D9N-DG 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.7% Below average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 11
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A85X Extreme4 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A85X Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $462
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback