QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '22 at 11:56
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8350U
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 58.9
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 206
65% 120 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 411
49% 378 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 43GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,437
Write 1779
Mixed 2,027
1,567% 2,081 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 48.4
8,398% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 337
3,026% 323 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
66.1% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 20.6
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 19.4
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback