HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory4.5 GB free of 7 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '22 at 12:52
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G850-$118
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 148
59% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 145
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1497) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 86 90 91 68 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 81.7
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 83.8
50% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 103%
WD Elements 500GB
417GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 22 23 22 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 18.2
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 22.3
28% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCF0-DJ-F Hynix HMT112U6DFR8C-H9 Kingston KTW149-ELD Hynix HMT112U6DFR8C-H9 7GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 1024, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
37% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.6
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 1,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback