HP Z640 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Z640 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212A
Memory105.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 20 '22 at 07:04
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 v3
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 141
58% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 552
49% 417 Pts
64-Core 1,382
86% 1,382 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 Graphics
AMD(1002 0B0D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1086 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.4.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.53% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 3
1% 3.83 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 5.8
5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 2.53%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HALR-000H2 1TB
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 980 956 955 970 972 984 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,373
Write 1,175
Mixed 1,140
SusWrite 970
262% 1,164 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 72
238% 81.7 MB/s
DQ Read 787
DQ Write 593
DQ Mixed 668
505% 683 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 219%
Great: 321%
Hitachi HUS728T8TALE6L4 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: W410
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 205 198 198 201 204 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 70% Great: 137%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
49GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 34.3
Mixed 26.9
SusWrite 34.1
44% 32 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.3
83% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G3B1 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.3% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.5
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 7.1
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z640 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z640 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $509
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback