Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210915
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 17 '22 at 18:19
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 91%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900KF-$310
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 80.2
1-Core 210
2-Core 425
123% 238 Pts
4-Core 838
8-Core 1,635
146% 1,237 Pts
64-Core 2,982
184% 2,982 Pts
Poor: 110%
This bench: 119%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.3.2
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.2% Above average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 65.5
Parallax 95.7
50% 74.4 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 72.7
Splatting 48.2
50% 62.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PC SN730 NVMe WDC 256GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11150012 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 588 382 374 375 376 366 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,782
Write 1,962
Mixed 1,553
SusWrite 410
320% 1,427 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 248
4K Mixed 63.3
275% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,060
DQ Write 706
DQ Mixed 372
416% 713 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 219%
Great: 240%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
341GB free
Firmware: X41200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 473 470 312 305 293 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 467
Mixed 348
SusWrite 389
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 41.7
163% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 248
208% 304 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
PC SN730 NVMe WDC 256GB
61GB free
Firmware: 11111012 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1742
Write 1,905
Mixed 1,554
388% 1,734 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 255
4K Mixed 62.3
278% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,064
DQ Write 1,658
DQ Mixed 899
811% 1,207 MB/s
Poor: 97% Great: 240%
Intel MEMPEK1J016GA 14GB
13GB free
Firmware: K4110400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 160 160 160 160 160 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 803
Write 161
Mixed 267
SusWrite 160
76% 348 MB/s
4K Read 264
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 142
601% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 870
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 264
259% 433 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 246%
Great: 246%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 4000 C19 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.2% Excellent
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 27
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 26.2
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 15,693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 - $187

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,419
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback