Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '22 at 01:53
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9820X-$550
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 82.7
1-Core 125
2-Core 253
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 980
87% 735 Pts
64-Core 1,658
103% 1,658 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.4% Very good
Lighting 90.4
Reflection 130
Parallax 89.5
74% 103 fps
MRender 96.7
Gravity 98.1
Splatting 94.7
79% 96.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,112
Write 1,834
Mixed 1,416
397% 1,787 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 96.9
4K Mixed 62.7
197% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 875
DQ Write 677
DQ Mixed 752
569% 768 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
WD Se 4TB-$90
187GB free
Firmware: 01.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 100 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 102
Write 91.1
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 98.5
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 100%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
193GB free
Firmware: 04.04V05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 108 109 108 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 108
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 69%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
10GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 12 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
7.93% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 13.4
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 12.6
15% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.93%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 52.9
MC Mixed 35.5
121% 42.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 11.7
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,654 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $798
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback