Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A514-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A514-54  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Lily_TL
Memory0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 14 '22 at 19:23
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 67
1-Core 108
2-Core 153
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 321
35% 279 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1468) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1003
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.02% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 13.4
7% 11.6 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.02%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8PCP3512F-AA 512GB
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 594 75 61 43 86 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60% Good
Read 344
Write 667
Mixed 422
SusWrite 151
90% 396 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 21.3
68% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 435
DQ Mixed 394
287% 368 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S1KA-4 Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
59.3% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 19
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 14.5
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A514-54 Builds (Compare 1,468 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A514-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback