Intel X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	96.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel X79 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200529
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '22 at 15:43
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0 6,987 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 93.2 2-Core 183 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 674 61% 514 Pts	64-Core 846 52% 846 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 77%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 301 307 297 309 302 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Read 474 Write 455 Mixed 383 SusWrite 321 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 39.7 133% 47.6 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 356 269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 124%
ASE8TNVME256 256GB 331 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 36GB free Firmware: E8TM14.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 77 74 75 76 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 322 Write 116 Mixed 94.3 SusWrite 76.7 33% 152 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 51.4 4K Mixed 30.5 73% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 93.3 DQ Mixed 150 107% 139 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 115%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 55GB free Firmware: 03.03E03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 104 103 103 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 95.7 Write 89.8 Mixed 60.4 SusWrite 103 64% 87.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 58%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB 6,021 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 34GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 15 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 14.4 Mixed 21.4 SusWrite 12.6 25% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 2.5 186% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Dimm2_Manufacturer SRT4G86U1-P9H Samsung M378B5173QH0- Dimm6_Manufacturer SLA302G08-GGN Samsung M378B5173DB0- 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.5% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 17.4 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 11.4 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	339x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	268x
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples	143x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	126x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	114x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	108x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	63x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	45x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	35x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	127x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	62x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16