Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite L40D-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba Satellite L40D-A  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA VDKTE
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130402
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 14 '22 at 01:19
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5345M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 49
2-Core 71.9
44% 65.5 Pts
4-Core 65.1
8-Core 71.9
9% 68.5 Pts
64-Core 69.4
4% 69.4 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8410G
Toshiba(1179 FA00) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
0.74% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2.7
0% 2.1 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.74%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
540GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA2OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 66 68 58 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 53.6
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 63.7
39% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 57%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 4GB
4GB free, PID 0745
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Read 4.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 3.7
5% 3.67 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 6.2
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L40D-A Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L40D-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback